Home / Guides / Quality Control and Pre-Shipment Inspection
Due diligence

Quality Control and Pre-Shipment Inspection

Where to check, what to check, and how to read an inspection report so that a quality problem is found in Vietnam rather than in your warehouse.

Quality issues in furniture are rarely dramatic. They are a finish that does not match the sample, a drawer that sticks, cartons that arrive crushed, or wood that cracks after a month in a dry climate. All of these are cheap to catch at the factory and expensive to resolve after a container has landed. This guide describes the checkpoints and the vocabulary you need to use them.

Three checkpoints, not one

The golden sample is the first. It is the physical reference for the whole order, approved and signed by both parties, and everything after it is measured against it. The second checkpoint is a during-production inspection when roughly 20 to 30 percent of the order is complete; it catches wrong materials, dimensions, or finishes while there is still time to correct them. The third is the pre-shipment inspection, booked when at least 80 percent of the order is finished and packed, so that the inspector can sample from cartons rather than from an unfinished line. Small or repeat orders can often skip the middle checkpoint, but a first order with a new factory benefits from all three.

What an inspection actually covers

A standard furniture inspection checks quantity against the order, workmanship and finish against the golden sample, dimensions against the drawings, function (drawers, doors, reclining mechanisms, stability on a flat floor), and packaging and shipping marks. On-site tests usually include a carton drop test, an assembly test for knock-down items, and a moisture content reading for solid wood, which should typically sit between 8 and 12 percent depending on the destination climate. Moisture is the test most worth insisting on: wood shipped too wet will shrink and crack once it reaches a heated or air-conditioned interior, and no amount of finish quality will hide it.

Understand AQL before you read a report

Inspectors sample rather than check every piece, and AQL (acceptable quality limit) is the statistical standard that defines how many pieces are checked and how many defects are tolerated. Most furniture inspections use ISO 2859-1 at general inspection level II with AQL 0 for critical defects, 2.5 for major, and 4.0 for minor. In plain terms: a critical defect (a safety issue such as a broken weld or an unstable chair) fails the shipment outright, a small number of major defects (visible finish damage, a non-functioning drawer) is tolerated, and a slightly larger number of minor ones (a faint scratch on an unseen surface) is allowed. Agree these levels with the factory in writing before the order, along with a short checklist of what counts as major and minor for your product, so a failed result is not a surprise to either side.

Who does the inspecting

Third-party firms such as QIMA, SGS, Intertek, and V-Trust operate throughout Vietnam's furniture clusters and typically charge a few hundred dollars per inspector per day, with a report delivered within 24 hours. This is the right choice for a first order or any order where you have no one on the ground. A factory's own QC report is worth requesting but should not replace independent inspection on early orders. Larger buyers sometimes place their own agent or QC staff at the factory, which makes sense once volumes justify it.

Acting on a failed report

A failed inspection is a negotiation, not a dead end. The usual options are rework followed by re-inspection, a partial rejection of the affected SKUs, or a price reduction if the defects are cosmetic and you can live with them. Your leverage depends on the balance payment still being in your account, which is why the payment terms guide recommends tying the balance to a passed inspection. Document everything with the inspection photos, keep the tone factual, and give the factory a clear path to fixing the problem; most Vietnamese exporters would rather rework than lose a customer, and how they respond to a failed report tells you more about them than a passed one does.